On January 27, finance ministers and top officials from 31 countries
signed the Multilateral Competent Authority Agreement on the Exchange of
Country-by-Country Reports (the Agreement), according to an OECD press release.
This is the first signing ceremony for the Agreement to facilitate the
automatic exchange of annual country-by-country (CbC) reports as recommended by
the OECD in its final report on transfer pricing documentation under the
G20/OECD base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS) project.
Background on CbC reporting. In 2015, the OECD recommended a new
three-tiered standardized approach to transfer pricing documentation under
Action 13 of the BEPS project. The approach was formally endorsed by G20
leaders in the same year.
Referred to as a “minimum standard,” the recommended approach would
require multinational enterprises (MNEs) with annual consolidated group revenue
equal to or exceeding €750 million to prepare and submit the following
documents:
(1) A master file with high-level
information about global business operations and transfer pricing policies that
would be made available to all relevant tax administrations;
(2) A local file with detailed
transactional transfer pricing documentation that is specific to each country,
disclosing (i) material related party transactions, (ii) the amounts involved
in such transactions, and (iii) the analysis of the transfer pricing
determinations made with regard to such transactions; and
(3) An annual CbC report to (i)
report the number of employees, stated capital, retained earnings, and tangible
assets in each jurisdiction where business is conducted, (ii) identify each
entity within the group doing business in a particular jurisdiction, and (iii)
provide an indication of the business activity in which each entity engaged.
The OECD recommended that the information required for the master and
local files be filed by the MNEs directly with the local tax administrations.
However, it recommended that the annual CbC reports be filed in the
jurisdiction of the tax residence of the ultimate parent entity and shared
between jurisdictions through the automatic exchange of information on a
government-to-government basis under one of the following tax agreements:
(1) The Multilateral Convention
on Mutual Administrative Assistance in Tax Matters (the Convention);
(2) Bilateral tax treaties; and
(3) Tax information exchange
agreements (TIEAs).
The Convention (see item 1 above), jointly developed by the OECD and the
Council of Europe in 1988 and amended by Protocol in 2010, is the most
comprehensive multilateral instrument available amongst jurisdictions for all
forms of tax cooperation to tackle tax evasion and avoidance (including the
exchange of information on a government-to-government basis), according to the OECD.
In fact, since 2009, the G20 has consistently encouraged countries to sign the
Convention. More than 90 countries (including the U.S.) currently participate
in the Convention. (The list of participating countries may be found here.)
According to the OECD, countries participating in the BEPS project
developed a CbC reporting implementation package, which among other things,
includes a model of the Agreement (see Annex IV to Chapter V of the final BEPS
Action 13 report). As the OECD explained, this model Agreement was developed
based on the Convention (see item 1 above) and “inspired” by the Multilateral
Competent Authority Agreement on Automatic Exchange of Financial Account
Information (the MCAA on AEOI) concerning the implementation of the Common Reporting
Standard (CRS).
Checkmark RIA observation: It should be noted that the AEOI standard and
the CRS draw extensively from the U.S. approach to implementing the Foreign
Account Tax Compliance Act (FATCA). More than 100 countries have currently
committed to implementing the CRS. The U.S. has not adopted the CRS, but
instead relies on its intergovernmental agreements (IGAs) with other countries
to facilitate the exchange of FATCA information.
For completeness, please that the OECD has also developed two other
model competent authority agreements for exchanging CbC reports. They are based
on bilateral treaties (see item 2 above) and TIEAs (see item 3 above), but are
beyond the scope of this article.
It is the OECD's recommendation that countries implement the BEPS Action
13 minimum standard for fiscal years beginning on or after Jan. 1, 2016. The
OECD has acknowledged that some jurisdictions may need time to follow their
particular domestic legislative process in order to make necessary adjustments
to the law.
31 countries signed the Agreement. The 31 countries that signed the
Agreement on January 27 are:
- Australia,
- Austria,
- Belgium,
- Chile,
- Costa Rica,
- Czech Republic,
- Denmark,
- Estonia,
- Finland,
- France,
- Germany,
- Greece,
- Ireland,
- Italy,
- Japan,
- Liechtenstein,
- Luxembourg,
- Malaysia,
- Mexico,
- The Netherlands,
- Nigeria,
- Norway,
- Poland,
- Portugal,
- Slovak Republic,
- Slovenia,
- South Africa,
- Spain,
- Sweden,
- Switzerland, and
- The United Kingdom.
The OECD has stated that the Agreement will enable the consistent and
swift implementation of the BEPS Action 13 minimum standard, facilitate the
automatic exchange of CbC reports, and ensure that confidential information is
safeguarded.
As OECD Secretary-General Angel Gurrìa stated at the media briefing on
January 27:
[t]onight marks an important step in the next stage of BEPS:
implementation, implementation, implementation! Without effective
implementation, we risk consigning the BEPS reports to books gathering dust on
shelves. That is why your efforts to transform the BEPS agreement into
reality–evidenced by your signature of the Multilateral Competent Authority
Agreement (MCAA) for the automatic exchange of country-by-country reports–are
so important.
Checkmark RIA observation: The precise manner under which the U.S. will
facilitate the automatic exchange of CbC reports remains to be seen. However,
in the preamble to the proposed CbC report regs that were issued in December
2015, Treasury and IRS stated that the U.S. competent authority is expected to
enter into competent authority arrangements for the automatic exchange of CbC
reports under the authority of information exchange agreements to which the
U.S. is a party. The preamble further provides that the U.S. intends to closely
scrutinize each jurisdiction's legal framework for maintaining confidentiality
of taxpayer information and its track record of complying with that legal
framework, before entering into an information exchange agreement with any such
jurisdiction.
If you would like any additional information regarding the tax aspects
of your going into business, or if you need assistance in satisfying any of the
reporting or recordkeeping requirements, please give me a call. Looking forward to hearing from you.
Click this link to view our YouTube video http://youtu.be/KfO0_kmz7qc
Amare
Berhie, Senior Tax Accountant
(651)
300-4777, (612)424-1540, (651) 621-5777
No comments:
Post a Comment